Author Archives: Allen Flemming

Larry’s Son

Eleven years ago on a Sunday morning before the Oscars I stood in the doorway of Larry

Norman’s bedroom and watched as he flew away from this planet to another land. A 

while later Larry’s son, Michael and his mom, Sarah came over and laid on each side of

Larry’s body.  I first met Mike late one night twenty years

earlier when I moved to North Hollywood in the apartment beneath Larry and Charles. One

night around midnight I heard the doorbell ring. I looked out the window and there was

Larry sitting on the steps. I opened the door to hang out or pray with him and found a little

three year old below me holding out his arms. I bent down and Mike hugged me

around the neck resting his head on my

shoulder.  I looked at Larry who was chuckling and introduced me to his son, “Mike this is

Flemmingway.” Two years later when Mike turned five he became friends with Jesus like

his father.


In Larry’s final days I prayed with him, read to him the red words in the Bible, talked to him

about his life, sang Beatles songs and more than anything we talked together to Jesus.

Every couple of hours I would cut up a Pink Lady apple for him, cool it in ice cubes and

then feed him little slices. Larry always thanked me and complimented me on how I had

prepared the fruit. Even in such horrifying pain Larry remained thankful and complimentary

to his friends and family. While Mike and Sarah were weeping beside Larry’s body on the

bed and  the rest of the family filled the room I left and  went into the kitchen. In the

refrigerator I found the apple I had cut up for Larry that morning, eight slices. There were

seven people in the bedroom and I was in the kitchen. When I told them about the eight

slices we all shared an apple communion together. Mike swallowed his slice with his

head on my shoulder.


Eleven years later nearly everything in my life has turned upside down. But Mike Norman,  

like his father did for thirty years, remains one of my closest friends. He and his wife,

Tiffany, help the orphans of Eden like me just as Larry did back in the day. 

Shining Like Stars

Last week Jennifer Robinson and Denny Fridkin sojourned to Larry Norman’s gravesite in Salem Oregon to pay their respects. Jennifer traveling all the way from Australia to Los Angeles, and then Denny Fridkin driving her a thousand miles from Los Angeles up to Salem. After a long prayerful and tearful visit at Larry’s gravesite, Jennifer and Denny met with Charles Norman. (Charles did not have to travel as far geographically, but after all the harassment his elderly mother, sisters, and nephew had to endure from the director of Fallen Angel, I know that this was a long trip for Charles to make as well.) If there had been no Fallen Angel, I believe (and most of the Normans concur) that this meeting would have happened years ago and resulted in either reconciliation or closure between the families depending on the results of the paternity test. Now, with all the damage done by outsiders, the road is full of obstacles. But love hopes all things…

Denny described Jennifer’s meeting with Charles as an auspicious event. I applaud all three of them here for bringing some peace into such a volatile situation. Hopefully the conversation will continue to pave the way to a peaceful resolution, this time without an incendiary video and traveling circus burning the bridges of reconciliation.

A few days later, Jennifer and Denny were in San Francisco. So I grabbed my tape recorder and I drove across the bridge to interview them. Jennifer spoke of praying and weeping at the gravesite, and of her love for Larry, and her anger that all of the beautiful things she had said about him had been edited out of the Fallen Angel video. Denny spoke about Larry leading him to Christ and had us all laughing as he recalled funny stories about life as Larry’s roommate. Of course it wasn’t all love and laughter. There is still the question of Jennifer’s son, Daniel, and his relationship to Larry, and, on the other side, the collaboration with Fallen Angel. But a conversation has begun between the Normans and the Robinsons, so there is hope. I told Jennifer and Denny I would do what I could to help them, but cautioned them that the only thing that I could see that would derail the hopes of a DNA test would be for either of them to involve again the director/producer of Fallen Angel.

Please join with us in praying for everyone involved.

“Do everything without complaining or arguing, so that you may become blameless and pure, children of God without fault in a crooked and depraved generation, in which you shine like stars in the universe as you hold on to the word of life.” Philippians 2:14 -16 (NIV)

Larry Norman: National Treasure

The United States Library of Congress has chosen Larry Norman’s album Only Visiting This Planet album to be deemed a National Treasure. The only other Rock album was U2’s Joshua Tree (an album depicting U2’s vision of America). What I love about this honor bestowed upon Larry is that the criteria for what music was chosen to be included in the Library of Congress had nothing to do with album sales or popularity, but rather, each album was deemed “culturally, historically or aesthetically significant.” Just try to imagine all the albums they had to choose from!

Only Visiting This Planet Deemed a National Treasure by the Library of Congress

Larry Norman's son Mike, Bono, and Larry

Larry Norman’s son Mike, Bono, and Larry

Librarian of Congress James H. Billington said of the significance of the registry “These recordings represent an important part of America’s culture and history.” As I know, and if you are reading this article you know, the art and life of Larry Norman contributed to shaping the culture within our small group of friends, but now the powers that be in America have recognized Larry’s contribution to the culture of the entire country.

Larry, now as long as America exists you will be forever remembered for what I remember you to be: A great artist who believed in Jesus, and who, inspired by America’s great artists Mahalia Jackson and Little Richard, Elvis Presley and  Bob Dylan, Herman Melville and Superman Comics, Robert Frost and Allen Ginsberg and countless classic movies; created a literature of music that shined a transforming light into the dark corners of my life and into the dark corners of America, and now will shine for all future generations.


  • Only Visiting This Planet – Larry Norman (1972)
  • A Night at Birdland (Vols. 1 and 2) – Art Blakey (1954)
  • Texas Sharecropper and Songster – Mance Lipscomb (1960)
  • The First Family – Vaughn Meader (1962)
  • Carnegie Hall Concert with Buck Owens and His Buckaroos – Buck Owens and His Buckaroos (1966)
  • Theme from ‘Shaft’ – Isaac Hayes (1971)
  • Celia & Johnny – Celia Cruz and Johnny Pacheco (1974)
  • Copland Conducts Copland: Appalachian Spring – Aaron Copland (1974)
  • Heart Like a Wheel – Linda Ronstadt (1974)
  • Sweeney Todd – Original Cast Recording (1979)
  • The Joshua Tree – U2 (1987)

Buy a copy today and give it to someone for Larry’s birthday!

And contribute to Larry’s favorite charity Compassion International in Larry’s name.

If you want to be on our mailing list or have any stories  about Larry you would like to share (especially film footage or photographs) please contact me at

Trilogy:tril·o·gy /ˈtriləjē/
a group of three related novels, plays, films, operas, or albums. (in ancient Greece) A series of three tragedies performed one after the other.

Larry Norman, who was very interested in literature, both studying it and creating it, produced three of his albums as parts of a trilogy; Only Visiting this Planet, So Long Ago the Garden, and In Another Land. Larry’s Trilogy was a masterful work, so profound that it inspired a doctoral dissertation, Rock for the Ages, A text in Context, Rhetorical Analysis of Larry Norman’s Trilogy.

During the Fallen Angel feeding frenzy the normally astute writer, Chris Willlman, Rock Critic from Entertainment Weekly, uttered the following.

For me, the first time I think I ever had questions about, “What’s he doing?,” or whatever, was when In Another Land came out, and it was like, “part 3 of a trilogy.” Okay, there’s this kind of self-mythologizing starting to happen, where it’s not okay to just put out three really great albums that are just great albums; they have to be, you know, “The Trilogy,” like Tolkien or C.S. Lewis, or something.

You know what, Mr. Willman? Larry Norman, in his genre, is analogous to J.R.R. Tolkien and C.S. Lewis in theirs.

Is Daniel Robinson Larry Norman’s Son

This is one of the most troubling articles for me to write because it involves Daniel Robinson’s agonizing desire to know whether or not Larry Norman is his father. In my attempt to find the truth in this paternity matter, I have spoken with the Normans (of course, having been a longtime friend of the family) and communicated through email with Daniel. Even knowing full well that I was the one shining the light on a number of false allegation made about Larry Norman, Daniel was remarkably cooperative with me. I tried to bring the families together to bring about a peaceful resolution, but was unsuccessful. In fact, I set up a Skype meeting between Charles and Daniel, Daniel showed up. So now I am simply going to present here the arguments and evidence of both sides and let the reader decide. Below are what I see to be the main arguments in this case.

Daniel’s mother Jennifer McCallum writes a public letter claiming that Larry Norman is her son, Daniel’s, father. (Letter: Next is Charles Norman’s rebuttal. there is a video of both Daniel and his mother again claiming that Larry is his father. ( is followed by  Charles Norman’s attempt to refute these allegations in an interview in Cross Rhythms . Then Charles responds to Jennifer’s letter:

This is the issue at its core: Daniel Robinson wants to know for sure if Larry Norman is his father, as he believes and his mother claims . If you know of any other information that would be helpful in adding clarity to this matter, please submit it to me at However, the truth about whether or not Larry Norman is Daniel Robinson’s father, in my opinion, will not be resolved without a DNA test.




Thursday, July 18, 2013

We have restored the audio recordings of Larry’s conversations with Pamela which were on the original Failed Angle web site. They can be found here.

Sunday, June 23, 2013

We’ve added a new presentation some of the facts and opinions to date on the matter of Larry Norman’s paternity of Daniel Robinson, and invite input.

Tuesday, July 6, 2010

Di Sabatino and Andrew Wallace have been telling people that they think Larry’s brother Charles Norman isn’t actually his brother, but his son. In response to this ridiculous claim, this site posted Charles Norman’s birth certificate which disproves this bizarre allegation. Shortly thereafter, David Di Sabatino claimed that the birth certificate has been “doctored” and that he has seen a “different” birth certificate for Charles Norman that contradicts the one posted here. Both he and Andrew Wallace still refuse to retract their errant statements since it would damage their credibility, I have therefore found it necessary to post undeniable photographic proof that they are wrong. YOU CAN SEE THESE PHOTOS HERE.

Friday, July 2, 2010

Jeff Taylor, Ph.D sent in his observations on the Fallen Angel movie. We thought it warranted some space here at It’s quite well done.

Saturday, June 5, 2010

The parable / parody page has been added to the site. It’s a humorous look at the spin Di Sabatino put in his Fallen Angel film.

Thursday, June 3, 2010

On June 1st, Charles Norman was interviewed by Mike Rimmer for Cross Rhythms Radio in England. In this lengthy live interview, Norman talks about the Fallen Angel movie, the Failed Angle web site, and the ongoing false allegations against Larry Norman. It’s quite an interesting listen. You can download or listen to the MP3 here [MISSING]. If you have any problems hearing it, or have any comments on the interview, please send me a message at the feedback page.

A Missive by Jeff Taylor, Ph.D

[Written by Jeff Taylor.]

Part 1

To the Failed Angle Facebook page:

Thank you for taking the time and effort to share the truth with the rest of the world. I’m under no illusions that LN was perfect. I’m not and I don’t know anybody who is. Did he father a child out of wedlock? Maybe, maybe not. It’s none of my business. It’s wrong if he did and if he lied about it afterwards, but I’ve got my own sins to worry about. But now David Di Sabatino and Randy Stonehill have taken it upon themselves to make it my business and the business of everyone else on the planet. This being the case, now I’m curious about the accuracy of the claim.

I get the impression that Di Sabatino is a social misfit who attached himself like a parasite onto Larry at a point when he was vulnerable, insinuated himself into his life, and had a love-hate relationship with someone he envied. He hoped—perhaps subconsciously—to gain some reflected glory by being associated with a genuine star. Upon initial completion of the movie, Di Sabatino was interviewed by an Orange County journalist: “The film, he says, is ‘my attempt to understand why [Larry Norman] was doing this to me.’ . . . My conceit or naiveté in beginning this whole ordeal was that there was a rational person somewhere in there that you could reason with,’ he says. ‘“Larry, your career is in the toilet. You are playing concerts to 100 diehard fans in your own back yard. Let me tell your story in such a way as to rehabilitate you. You are going to have to admit to some stuff . . . but do it, take your lumps, and people will respond favorably.” I didn’t realize that there wasn’t a rational bone in his body.’” ( Note Di Sabatino’s unintended revealing of narcissism and arrogance.

When the would-be savior was turned down by Larry Norman, he [DD] turned on him with a vengeance.

I get the impression that Stonehill is a self-seeking liar. I wasn’t impressed the first and last time I saw him in concert, in the early 1980s, with either his seriousness or spirituality. I think he’s someone who was lucky, or blessed, enough to hook up with Larry but he grew to resent his mentor over time. I could be wrong, but these are my impressions. I read Norman’s letter to Stonehill, and I read Stonehill’s letter to his ex-wife, I read the letters from Pamela, and I read the Internet exchanges between LN and Di Sabatino, and they tell me all I need to know. Still, I’m interested in reading more! I guess it’s voyeurism, in a way. But I’ve always been interested in the search for truth and the pursuit of justice, not to mention conspiracies. I think we’ve got all of the above going on here.

As you say on your opening page, even if all of the allegations are true, the “documentary” is a diabolical exercise. (The word Devil means slanderer or accuser.) Dredging up personal sins from years ago and making money off them? Bringing an over-the-hill CCM star back into the spotlight? Stonehill especially should be ashamed of himself. Hooked up with a guy who is now saying Charles Norman is also Larry’s illegitimate son? Wow. Stonehill also seems like an ingrate. If it weren’t for Norman, where would the guy be today? It’s unlikely he would have had the small taste of celebrity he’s enjoyed within the Christian subculture. His best work was with Norman in the late 1970s. He repays that debt by copying the arrangements of his most famous songs and using them as the soundtrack for a hatchet job against Norman.

Di Sabatino keeps saying Larry Norman never admitted to any fault, any sin, any weakness. That’s absurd. I’ve been reading and listening to him since 1979. His songs, liner notes, interviews, and comments on stage constantly acknowledged the fact that he was fallible and imperfect. His letter to Randy is full of apology and regret. Even his Internet exchange with Di Sabatino is, overall, respectful and humble. What is the song “I Am a Servant” if not an eloquent testimony of failure and weakness? There’s no cover up there.

I became a fan of LN as a freshman in college. I was a relatively new Christian. When I first heard In Another Land, it wasn’t just the music that blew me away. It was the liner notes and the interview (even if the questions were self-written…who cares…McCartney did the same thing with his first solo LP). There was a depth to Larry that instantly appealed to me—not just spiritual, but also intellectual and artistic. He became my favorite singer and although I left the CCM ghetto long ago (repulsed by its shallowness and worldliness), he remains in my all-time top four, after Dylan, the Beatles, and U2. So I’m still a fan. It doesn’t mean I think he was incapable of fornication or adultery, or fathering a son and not acknowledging it, or resume-padding or unfair characterizations of enemies, etc. He was a man. He may or may not have done some of those things. But I also know he was deeply committed to the Lord. He wasn’t a con artist. He had a genuine heart for Jesus Christ.


I’m a fan but I’m not star struck.  I grew up.  I’m not sure that David Di Sabatino ever did.  There’s something twisted about his personality.  Almost like a stalker.  Stuck in some adolescent stage that has delusions of grandeur and Randy Stonehill (or whoever financed his movie) is helping him to live out those delusions at the expense of other people . . . and the Kingdom of God.  Fallen Angel  is an abomination on all kinds of levels.

I have to agree with Greg Schumacher, who writes on the Failed Angle Facebook page, “I can read this DiSabatino like a cheap pamphlet.  He’s a wanna-be that could not get recognized by anyone and never got over it.  He wanted to be big in the Lord and wasn’t. He wanted to be an integral part of the Jesus movement and he wasn’t. He wanted people to pore over his words like they did Frisbee’s and Norman’s, but they didn’t.  Wasn’t in the cards for him, and this is such classic bitterness towards God and others it’s pathetic. A feeble attempt at exalting oneself above others, pure approbation lust. . . . ‘A Bible Story’???  How presumptuous, to compare your veiled revenge to God’s Word.”

One of the lamest things I’ve read is the defense of the movie that goes, “But Randy isn’t vengeful against Larry.  In the film, he forgives him.”  How noble!  It’s easy to forgive when you’re successfully smearing a dead man’s reputation.  Stonehill may be forgiving Norman for things he was never guilty of in the first place.  It reminds me of something A.W. Tozer wrote: “Religious acts done out of low motives are twice evil, evil in themselves and evil because they are done in the name of God.  This is equivalent to sinning in the name of the sinless One, lying in the name of the One who cannot lie and hating in the name of the One whose nature is love.”

Recently, I’ve had the privilege of getting to know Ralph Nader on a personal level.  This has been a thrill for me, as someone who’s supported him for president.  What a relief to learn that the private man is the same as the public man.  The admiration was not misplaced.  Ralph isn’t a creep or a phony as a human being.  He’s kind, polite, smart, and funny.  That’s the exact same impression I get from reading Larry’s lengthy Internet rebuttal to Di Sabatino and his letter to Stonehill.  The same qualities I’ve appreciated in his songs are obvious in his letters.  The nuance, the sensitivity, the dislike of cant but regard for other people’s feelings and dignity.  They evidence an intelligent, knowledgeable, balanced, mature individual, with a Christlike spirit at the center.

I don’t get that impression with Di Sabatino.  Quite the opposite.  I think the Australian woman’s claims about her son were first contained in a letter posted on the Daniel Amos website.  It’s quite a cozy little circle they’ve got going there—about as small as the Norman family that they are so quick to deride.  I know Larry recognized the genuine talent of Randy Stonehill and Terry Taylor, and he spoke highly of them in public during his last years.  It’s too bad they can’t return the favor.  I think teaming up with Di Sabatino poisoned the well and encouraged their worst instincts rather than their best.


I have a PhD in political science from the University of Missouri.  History was my undergraduate minor and graduate outside field.  Political history is one of my specialties.  As a political scientist and historian, I know there is a certain level of research and evidence necessary for credibility when advancing theories and publishing assertions.  Fallen Angel does not begin to rise to that level.

At first glance, the recorded testimony of so many LN friends and colleagues from the 1960s and 1970s seems damning.  Less so upon closer inspection.  First off, it’s not testimony given under oath.  There can be no legal repercussions for slandering a deceased public figure.  You don’t need a PhD to realize that many politicians lie on a regular basis.  They look straight into the camera and lie.  Many of them are professed Christians.  Why should we assume a Christian entertainer is incapable of doing the same thing?  Some folks are sociopathic or delusional.  This may or may not be true in this situation.

We do know that no evidence is given for anything that is contended about Larry Norman.  We are expected to take the word of the people being interviewed.  No documents are shown.  Why, for example, does the camera not show the supposedly incriminating emails from Norman to the family of his supposed illegitimate son in Australia?  Why haven’t those documents been posted online?  What about the birth certificate for the boy?  Who was identified as the father on the certificate?  The mother complains that Norman didn’t sign it, but fathers never sign birth certificates (at least in the U.S.).  Hospitals, however, do record the name of the father as given by the mother.

The main accusers in Fallen Angel are cult members who were in the band People in the 1960s, a few men who were business associates who became commercial rivals of LN in the 1970s and 1980s, and his first ex-wife.  All have obvious reasons for holding a grudge and bad-mouthing Norman.  The Scientologists dislike his Christianity.  The disgruntled Solid Rock men are exacting long-delayed revenge.  His former wife is overlooking, on camera, her apparent adultery and drug use while they were married.  Still, to her credit, Pam had second thoughts about Di Sabatino after her on-camera interview.

The most interesting thing is who does not appear in the “documentary.”  Nobody from the Norman family appears.  Norman’s second ex-wife does not appear.  (She was first married to Stonehill so she would have an especially interesting perspective.)  His friends Frank Black and Allen Flemming do not appear.  An even older friend, Cliff Richard, was interviewed for hours; all but a few seconds of his comments ended up on the cutting room floor.  Gene Mason, co-vocalist of People, is absent.  Alex MacDougall, who drummed for Daniel Amos and LN, is absent.  Same with Billy Batstone, bass player for Norman and Stonehill.  Ditto Mark Walker, drummer on In Another Land (LN) and Welcome to Paradise (RS).  When Larry died, Walker recalled, “It’s such a blessing to see how he lived for our Lord and ‘lived’ Him in all areas.”  Where’s keyboardist Dan Cutrona, who began working with Norman in the studio and in concert in 1979?

Surviving big-names from the early Jesus Music era are absent: John Fischer, Chuck Girard, Nancy Honeytree, Paul Clark, Darrell Mansfield, Phil Keaggy, Barry McGuire, and 2nd Chapter of Acts.  Malcolm Wilde and Alwyn Wall, who were musical contemporaries of Norman and Stonehill in the 1970s, are not found.

Author Steve Turner, who first met Larry in 1972 and “spent many hours, days and weeks in his company,” cannot be found in the movie.  Musician Norman Barratt , who became a friend of LN around the same time, is also absent.  When Norman died, Barratt wrote, “In all that time he remained a faithful, trustworthy friend who was incredibly thoughtful and considerate. He was generous and loving, putting Jesus before himself, whilst making some people feel uncomfortable when he saw through the insincerity and sometimes downright wrongdoing that dogged our industry for years.”

Arthur Blessitt, a fellow Jesus Movement pioneer, is nowhere in sight.  When Norman died, Blessitt commented, “He came up with the ‘One Way’ finger pointed toward heaven . . . We did Jesus marches and Jesus rallies together across the U.S. and England.  Larry had passion for Jesus mixed with an understanding of people. . . . Larry was a Jesus revolutionary owned by no one but his Lord.  He cared, loved and stayed faithful to following Jesus.”  Maybe that’s why Blessitt does not appear in the movie.  His recounting of the facts undercuts the drama of the storyline.

If Larry Norman were the dishonest jerk, the demonic “fallen angel,” he is portrayed to be, surely someone else outside the Scientology-Stonehill nexus would have noticed and been willing to publicly say so as part of a cautionary tale.  The first album of the great Mark Heard was produced by Larry Norman and put out by Solid Rock in 1979.  My impression of Heard was that he was a man who took his Christianity very seriously and had considerable intellectual and artistic depth.  I think it’s telling that Mark Heard continued to work with Larry Norman until Heard died in 1992.

To sum up, I don’t find the Fallen Angel thesis to be believable.  It’s too obviously a revenge piece.  You can see this by watching the trailer.  One participant asks, with feigned indignation, “Why is the Devil singing the music?”  By the time one gets to the trailer’s end—a cutesy cartoon of Larry Norman removing an angel mask, replete with halo, and putting on a devil mask—any knowledgeable and objective person will recognize this movie for what it is and understand that it lacks seriousness.  The “Jester Media” designation for Di Sabatino’s movie company is a Freudian slip.  The movie itself is not just a missed opportunity.  It is a topsy-turvy hit piece that would be funny if it were not defaming a good man and being taken seriously by Christians who do not know better.

Jeff Taylor

Jacksonville State University

May 18-19, 2010

Goodbye, My Friends, Goodbye

[This article first appeared under the title “In the Final Hours of Larry Norman” in Greater Than Magazine.]


First Baptist Church on Haight and Octavia in San Francisco 1952

Larry Norman stood up out of his seat and started for the altar. At the end of the row his father tried to stop him…

“Larry, where do you think you’re going?”

“To meet Jesus.”

“You’re five years old, now sit down.”

“Dad, I know what I’m doing.”

Salem, Oregon 2008

I got a phone message from Charles Norman, telling that if I wanted to see Larry before he left this world that I should come soon. I called back planning to tell him I would fly up from San Francisco the next weekend. Charles’ wife Kristin answered instead and said that I better come sooner. A few hours later I was on a flight to Oregon.

As I drove from the Portland airport to Salem, Oregon, I thought back to the time I had spent with Larry; the late night meals at all night restaurants where Larry spoke to complete strangers about the love of Jesus, the house church meetings in San Jose and Hollywood where he always seemed to be the one closest to the heart of Jesus.

There he was. Larry Norman in a black t-shirt, propped up in bed, his long hair gone. His arms and legs swollen and bandaged; he looked like a man whose organs were shutting down. But his eyes were the same. Bright with that only-visiting-this planet shine. Larry looked at me like I was the very person he had hoped most in the world to see. This is the way he looked at all the people in his circle of friends. When you were with Larry, you never saw him glancing at a clock or looking around for someone more interesting. I wanted more than anything to be that person Larry remembered me to be. I quickly repented of the complacent man I had become, but I only saw love in Larry’s eyes. Larry smiled at me and then apologized for how startling he must look.Then he asked me how I was doing. How I was doing. I muttered something. Larry then asked if I would read the Bible to him. I opened one of the Normans’ Bibles -it must have been 100 years old- and  a couple of pages fell out and floated to the floor. I felt compelled to read from the Book of Revelation. Forgive me Jesus and John, but I left out all the beastly verses. Larry sighed and smiled when I read about the throne and the One on the Throne and the Marriage Feast of the Lamb.

There was definitely some otherworldly fearlessness about Larry Norman. A Christian who was not afraid of to use a medium created by blacks to wake up the white church to their sinful racist and hawkish ways, writing songs against the war in Vietnam and the KKK. Larry Norman. There he was praying without ceasing, He was laughing in his sleep. He was singing black gospel songs and Beatles songs. He was forgiving and grateful. He thanked me for every little thing. And when Kristin was in the middle of telling him that he was close to the end, he motioned her close and gently slipped a loose strand of her hair behind her ear. We read the middle of Matthew and the end of Revelation. We marveled at Joe Cocker in Across the Universe.

When we returned from the emergency room on the night Larry died, Larry said “can we pray before I go home?”  And even though we were right in front of his house where he had not been for weeks, Charles and I knew what Larry meant. Charles asked him, “Do you mean your house here in Salem or your home in Heaven?” Larry said, “Both.”  I honestly can’t remember a single word we prayed except that we all ended our prayers in Jesus’ Name.  Charles, for the hundredth time, lifted Larry out of the van, and I moved the wheelchair into place. Charles, Kristin, Silver and Kristy, Nancy (and many others) had spent many days changing the whole layout of Larry’s place, so it would be wheelchair accessible. Longtime friend Rick van Dyne, who also worked tirelessly on the remodel, came out and helped us get Larry into the house. As we rolled him up to his door, Larry began praising God, – Jesus thank you for the sky and the stars and the moon and the little boy with the bubble on his head (a stone statue of a young boy holding a glass fish bowl on his head stood in the middle of the yard). Inside the house the carpet was gone and the new laminate wood floors were sparkling. As we navigated Larry toward his old room he said, “Everything is so beautiful”, and again I was wondering if he was seeing both worlds. We put him in his bed, and soon Larry was asleep. We all went to our rooms and fell asleep.

Around 3:00 AM  Kristin knocked on my door. Flemming, wake up. Larry is dying. I rushed into Larry’s room where Charles and Kristin were holding Larry in their arms. “Larry, are you okay?” Charles said.

“I am perfect,” Larry replied and departed for another land.

Larry committed his life to following Jesus when he was young, like many of us do. Being in love with Jesus as a child is one thing. To keep your love for Jesus strong through all the years is another. This was the real thing. Not faith from a story in a book or rehearsed words from a pulpit or on a TV screen. Larry Normans faith stood tall in the face of certain death, before his mother, before his brother and sisters, before his friend of thirty years: a safe haven to share doubts or fears. No fear. No doubts. Faith alone. The same faith, the same truth, the same unabashed love for Jesus, that Larry had declared from the altar when he was five, then from the stage and on the streets, he declared from his death bed.

I met Larry Norman in the late 1970’s, and we continued to be friends for the rest of his life. I saw Larry Norman day after day after day in a hundred different situations. I knew him when he was broke and when he was stuffing hundred dollar bills into his visitors coats that were hanging in the closet, during the L.A. earthquake and the Rodney King riot. I was with him in Cedars Sinai Hospital after his first heart attack and in his home in Salem after his last. Larry Norman really was a true follower of Jesus. I can easily see why Frank Black said that Larry was “the most Christ-like person I ever met.” Larry Norman committed his life at five years of age and followed Jesus for the next 55 years, and in his final hours he had no concern about his own soul. For him the destiny of his soul was decided in 1952.

Larry knew he was in his final hours, And just like every other day of his life, what he wanted to talk about the most was Jesus and now the wonder of seeing his Lord face to face. When I stepped into his room three days before he died, Larry apologized to me for how difficult it must be for me to look at him. This was so typical of him, his concern for others. “Make sure the children I support through Compassion International continue to be supported, find Steve Scott and tell him this, or Mark Heard’s widow and give her that, some woman loaned me that scarf, please have it sent to her  . . .” And his prayers were similar, focused on Jesus and others.

For me, a seminarian doctoral program dropout full of doubts, Larry Norman was a walking apologetic for the existence of God.  For those of us who really knew him, what comes to mind first when we think about Larry Norman is and always will be his undying love for Jesus Christ.


Charles Norman: Brother or Son?

Regarding David Di Sabatino and Andrew Wallace and their claim that Larry Norman is the father of Charles Norman:

David Di Sabatino, Andrew Wallace, and their followers have been insisting that Charles Norman is actually Larry Norman’s son, not his brother. When they were recently presented with a copy of Charles Norman’s birth certificate which proved them wrong, they called the document a forgery. David Di Sabatino has even pushed all credibility by stating that he has been shown a DIFFERENT copy of Charles’ birth certificate (as if someone is out there walking around showing someone else’s birth certificate to people!).

The reason Andrew Wallace and Di Sabatino may be denying this is that if it’s proven that Charles is really Larry’s brother, their credibility takes a another severe blow. Andrew Wallace and Di Sabatino have both been confronted with the evidence so far, and they have both decided to neither comment nor retract their statements.

Why exactly?

  1. If they admit that they were wrong, people are going to wonder what else they were wrong about besides this reckless accusation. Di Sabatino’s reputation as a journalist will be even more damaged than it already is, and Andrew Wallace will come off as someone who is extremely misinformed in his claims about Larry Norman’s history of paternity.
  2. If they continue to deny the authenticity of Charles’ birth certificate, they will look even more foolish than they already do. It’s a catch-22 situation for them, but that’s where you end up when you spread lies and innuendo and get caught.

Below are photographs of Mrs. Norman and her newborn baby, Charles.

Here's Margaret Norman (Charles' mother) being wheeled out of O'Connor Hospital with the newborn baby, Charles.

Here’s Margaret Norman (Charles’ mother) being wheeled out of O’Connor Hospital with the newborn baby, Charles.

Here's Margaret Norman and Charles in his first day home from the hospital.

Here’s Margaret Norman and Charles in his first day home from the hospital.

Here are Charles' siblings Larry, Nancy, and Kristy meeting their little brother for the first time.

Here are Charles’ siblings Larry, Nancy, and Kristy meeting their little brother for the first time.

For those of you who now realize that you have been duped by David Di Sabatino and Andrew Wallace and had perhaps joined in spreading rumors about Mrs. Norman and her sons, you are welcome to send the Norman family a note or an apology via my address and I will forward it to them.

Shot Down?—A Response to Rumors Spread by the Fallen Angel Film

When Larry Norman passed away in February of 2008, an incredible assortment of unsubstantiated rumors about him began darting around the dark corners of the Internet, propelled in large part by a Canadian journalist, David Di Sabatino.

Various Christian publications began citing Di Sabatino’s accusatory articles on the life of Larry Norman, nearly always without any attempt to contact the Norman family or any of Norman’s well known friends to verify the veracity of these accusations. The film Fallen Angel has recorded these imprecations aimed at Larry Norman. Below is a review I wrote upon seeing the film.

A Venue of Vultures

My initial response to David Di Sabatino’s film Fallen Angel: The Outlaw Larry Norman – A Bible Story

I saw the premiere of Fallen Angel: The Outlaw Larry Norman – A Bible Story by David Di Sabatino at the San Jose film festival on March 1, 2009. I was appalled. Larry Norman had passed away only the year before (February 24th 2008) and here was a movie with a diabolic angle — destroy the legacy of Larry Norman. Equally appalling was the handful of Christians who had appeared in the film showing up in person to support the film and to continue their attacks on Larry Norman.

God Have Mercy

Even if all the accusations about Larry Norman were true, which they are not, one would expect these Christians, who claim to have experienced the forgiveness for their sins through the sacrificial death of Jesus, would have, after 3 or 4 decades, forgiven their brother in Christ, so recently buried. You would not expect followers of Jesus to gather around to peck at the reputation of their brother in Christ for sins they believe he had committed so long ago.

Where were the thoughts of compassion toward the grieving family? Where was the love for their brother in Christ who had so recently passed and was therefore unable to respond? What type of people participate in this sort of postmortem character assassination?

What species of Christianity is this?

As I watched the character assassination of Larry Norman, it began to sound familiar somehow. Who else did I know who had also been accused of being delusional, crazy, and labeled a “Fallen Angel” and an “Outlaw”? And what would happen if I applied David Di Sabatino’s documentary method in telling His story? Click here for the answer.

A Word to the Loved Ones of the People Involved with Fallen Angel

Before I go any further in this exposé let me say a word to the families and friends and fans of the people exposed here. Because of you, the innocent bystander, I have done my best to soften the blows. I have, whenever possible, excluded documentation of drug use, larceny, and infidelity among the Christian celebrities and participants involved with Fallen Angel. However in some cases this was unavoidable when refuting the accusations made against Larry Norman. Also I am limiting myself for the most part to only those people in the film who showed up in person at the premiere in support of Fallen Angel. All of you please forgive your loved ones in advance.

A Word for Daniel Robinson

Daniel Robinson is also a victim of Fallen Angel. Because of his family’s continued threats of legal action I have been advised by council not to address Daniel’s concerns or the stories he has been told by those involved with Fallen Angel at this time. I can only guess how disturbing and disheartening all this must be for him.


Admirably, the family of Larry Norman declined, for the most part, to address or respond to the filmed and published diatribes. Also they are still mourning the loss of their loved one. The Norman family is inclined to turn the other cheek here.

I had been writing Larry Norman’s biography, and I was given carte blanche access to Larry’s unbelievably extensive archives of letters, emails, photographs, contracts, agreements, correspondence, and cassette recordings of business meetings dating back to the 1960s. What I uncovered disproved many of the claims of Larry’s past associates, “friends” and acquaintances.

I had a chance a year ago to interview the director and a couple of the “actors” in the theater lobby after the “first premiere” screening. I raised several concerns and questions about the veracity of the film, mentioning to them that I personally knew the Normans and that the film seemed to be at odds with everything I was familiar with in my dealings with Larry. “What evidence do you have for all the accusations made against Larry Norman in Fallen Angel?”, I asked. I was not the only one there asking these tough questions about the film (I seemed to be the only one there with a microphone however). No supporting evidence was offered by any of the people featured in Fallen Angel. Nearly everything was anecdotal.

I am writing Larry Norman’s biography, and I have been given carte blanche access to Larry’s unbelievably extensive archives of letters, emails, photographs, contracts, agreements, correspondence, and cassette recordings of business meetings dating back to the 1960s. To date I have only scratched the surface of these multitudinous documents, but what I have uncovered so far inarguably disproves many of the claims of Larry’s past associates, “friends” and acquaintances. So in these pages I will defend Larry Norman with substantial evidence against Fallen Angel’s unsubstantiated accusations.


Why would these people who call themselves Christians go to such lengths to attack their brother in Christ? Who but God knows what moves the hearts of men. So the following is what I have found that might be what fuels the unquenchable fires that burn in the hearts of Larry Norman’s accusers.

Let the readers be the judge.

– A. Flemming – January 2010